JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 4 1119-1126
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casanova, L.
Right arrow Articles by Schneeberger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casanova, L.
Right arrow Articles by Schneeberger, M.

Inbreeding in Swiss Braunvieh and Its Influence on Breeding Values Predicted from a Repeatability Animal Model

L. Casanova 1, C. Hagger 1, N. Kuenzi 1, and M. Schneeberger 2

1 Institute of Animal Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
2 Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia

Inbreeding coefficients were computed for 910,444 animals of the Swiss Braunvieh population. Of the animals born in 1984, 71.5% were inbred with 67.9, 3.4, and 2% having inbreeding coefficients between >0 and 5%, >5 to 10%, and >10%, respectively. The average inbreeding coefficient was 1.14% but, for animals with both parents and at least one grandparent known, it was 1.67%.

Breeding values for total milk, fat, and protein yields and for fat and protein percentages were predicted using a repeatability animal model including a regression on the inbreeding coefficient. Phenotypic performance was sizeably depressed for milk yield only (–26 kg/% of inbreeding or 2.4% of the phenotypic standard deviation). Adjusting for inbreeding increased the estimated genetic trend slightly. Inbreeding is only partially accounted for when it is ignored in the construction of the inverse of the numerator relationship matrix. This effect was investigated by comparing predicted breeding values from a model including the complete matrix with predicted breeding values from a model including a matrix constructed with inbreeding ignored. Only .8% of all predicted breeding values were affected by more than ±5.5 kg. The maximum difference observed was 55.3 kg. The observed average absolute differences between the breeding values of offspring predicted with the two models increased with inbreeding of parents.

Key Words: inbreeding • genetic evaluation • animal model

Submitted on June 28, 1991
Accepted on December 2, 1991




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. M. Parland, J. F. Kearney, M. Rath, and D. P. Berry
Inbreeding Effects on Milk Production, Calving Performance, Fertility, and Conformation in Irish Holstein-Friesians
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4411 - 4419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Croquet, P. Mayeres, A. Gillon, H. Hammami, H. Soyeurt, S. Vanderick, and N. Gengler
Linear and Curvilinear Effects of Inbreeding on Production Traits for Walloon Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. C. Sorensen, P. Madsen, M. K. Sorensen, and P. Berg
Udder health shows inbreeding depression in danish holsteins.
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 4077 - 4082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Croquet, P. Mayeres, A. Gillon, S. Vanderick, and N. Gengler
Inbreeding depression for global and partial economic indexes, production, type, and functional traits.
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2257 - 2267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.