| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-0701
2 Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands
Dynamic programming to solve the Markov decision process problem of optimal insemination and replacement decisions was adapted to address large dairy herd management decision problems in the US. Expected net present values of cow states (151,200) were used to determine the optimal policy. States were specified by class of parity (n = 12), production level (n = 15), month of calving (n = 12), month of lactation (n = 16), and days open (n = 7). Methodology optimized decisions based on net present value of an individual cow and all replacements over a 20-yr decision horizon. Length of decision horizon was chosen to ensure that optimal policies were determined for an infinite planning horizon. Optimization took 286 s of central processing unit time.
The final probability transition matrix was determined, in part, by the optimal policy. It was estimated iteratively to determine postoptimization steady state herd structure, milk production, replacement, feed inputs and costs, and resulting cash flow on a calendar month and annual basis if optimal policies were implemented. Implementation of the model included seasonal effects on lactation curve shapes, estrus detection rates, pregnancy rates, milk prices, replacement costs, cull prices, and genetic progress. Other inputs included calf values, values of dietary TDN and CP per kilogram, and discount rate. Stochastic elements included conception (and, thus, subsequent freshening), cow milk production level within herd, and survival. Validation of optimized solutions was by separate simulation model, which implemented policies on a simulated herd and also described herd dynamics during transition to optimized structure.
Key Words: optimization • insemination • replacement • dynamic programming
Submitted on June 3, 1991
Accepted on October 7, 1991
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A.-M. Heikkila, J. I. Nousiainen, and L. Jauhiainen Optimal Replacement Policy and Economic Value of Dairy Cows with Diverse Health Status and Production Capacity J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2342 - 2352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. De Vries Economic value of pregnancy in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 3876 - 3885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. L. Hadley, C. A. Wolf, and S. B. Harsh Dairy cattle culling patterns, explanations, and implications. J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2286 - 2296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. de Vries and C. A. Risco Trends and Seasonality of Reproductive Performance in Florida and Georgia Dairy Herds from 1976 to 2002 J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3155 - 3165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. de Vries Economics of Delayed Replacement When Cow Performance is Seasonal J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 2947 - 2958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Groenendaal, D. T. Galligan, and H. A. Mulder An Economic Spreadsheet Model to Determine Optimal Breeding and Replacement Decisions for Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2146 - 2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
