|
|
||||||||
1 Animal Breeding and Genetics Unit
2 Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
Given appropriate genetic resources, there is a range of approaches that can be taken to exploit crossbreeding in dairy cattle. These all require animal evaluation in a procedure that accommodates the genetic mechanisms causing heterosis and the effect of mate genotype on progeny merit. For each characteristic measured, expression in each crossbred type can be considered as a different trait and a multitrait model fitted for predicting a range of proofs, one for each candidate mate genotype. Implementation of mate selection based on these evaluations can be carried out to yield a sensible "fine structure" of program design (optimally exploiting crossing and selection effects) within a chosen "coarse structure" of program design (such as four-pathway design or multiple ovulation and embryo transfer design). Future developments may yield mate selection strategies that also generate such coarse structure designs, accommodating benefits of assortative mating, appropriate progeny testing, avoidance of inbreeding, attention to genetic connection between breeds, herds, and countries, and other animal breeding issues of importance.
Key Words: crossbreeding cattle evaluation symposium
Submitted on November 26, 1990
Accepted on April 1, 1991
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick Short Communication: Effect of Environment on the Expression of Breed and Heterosis Effects for Production Traits J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1548 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Maltecca, H. Khatib, V. R. Schutzkus, P. C. Hoffman, and K. A. Weigel Changes in conception rate, calving performance, and calf health and survival from the use of crossbred Jersey x Holstein sires as mates for Holstein dams. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2747 - 2754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Wall, S. Brotherstone, J. F. Kearney, J. A. Woolliams, and M. P. Coffey Impact of Nonadditive Genetic Effects in the Estimation of Breeding Values for Fertility and Correlated Traits J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 376 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Weigel and K. A. Barlass Results of a Producer Survey Regarding Crossbreeding on US Dairy Farms J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 4148 - 4154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Jordan Effects of Heat Stress on Reproduction J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2003; 86(13_suppl): E104 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. VanRaden and A. H. Sanders Economic Merit of Crossbred and Purebred US Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2003; 86(3): 1036 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. McAllister Is Crossbreeding the Answer to Questions of Dairy Breed Utilization? J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2002; 85(9): 2352 - 2357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |