JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 10 2892-2901
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VanRaden, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoeschele, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VanRaden, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoeschele, I.

Use of Reproductive Technology to Estimate Variances and Predict Effects of Gene Interactions

P. M. VanRaden 1, T. J. Lawlor 2, T. H. Short 2, and I. Hoeschele 3

1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
2 Holstein Association, Brattleboro, VT 05302-0808
3 Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0315

Advanced reproductive techniques are creating the large numbers of close relatives needed to study gene interactions. Identical triplets, a set of 26 full sisters, a family of 4215 three-quarter sisters (same sire and maternal grandsire), a family of 76,698 half sisters, and 1.6 million granddaughters of Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation now have lactation records. Similarity of closest relatives might be explained by similar nonadditive as well as additive genetic merit. The 23,015 families of full sisters with mean family size of 3 provide nearly as much information about dominance variation as do the 55,779 families of three-quarter sisters with mean family size of 13; the 79 families of clones provide little information by comparison. Hypothetically, REML analysis of all US Holstein data could provide estimates of dominance and additive x additive variance with standard errors approximately 1% of phenotypic variance, but estimates of any higher order interactions would have standard errors >10%. The tilde-hat approximation proved to be incompatible with animal models but was used for sire-maternal grandsire analysis of 765,868 first lactation records. Dominance variance was estimated as 3.5% of phenotypic variance for milk and 3.3% for fat with standard error of 4.2%. With constant data set size, variances are estimated most precisely if family size equal 1 plus ratio of within-family to between-family variance. An animal model evaluation including dominance relationships for 581,670 animals was computed, but gene interactions from distant ancestor pairs were ignored. Mating advice and improved additive predictions, especially for clones, could be obtained by including dominance in models.

Key Words: reproductive technology • gene interaction • clones • dominance variance

Submitted on October 1, 1991
Accepted on December 27, 1991




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Gulisija, D. Gianola, and K. A. Weigel
Nonparametric Analysis of the Impact of Inbreeding on Production in Jersey Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 493 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.