JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 10 2769-2775
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shockey, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shockey, W. L.

Evaluation of Pearl Millet and Field Peas Plus Triticale Silages for Midlactation Dairy Cows

M. A. Messman 1, W. P. Weiss 1, P. R. Henderlong 1, and W. L. Shockey 1

1 Department of Dairy Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691

A mixture of field peas and triticale was planted in spring, harvested as silage, and followed by a double crop of pearl millet, which also was harvested as silage. Eighteen Holstein cows were fed diets based on pea with triticale, pearl millet, or alfalfa plus corn silages. Dry matter digestibility of the pea with triticale diet was higher than for control (71.1 vs. 66.9%), but DM digestibility was not different between control and pearl millet diets. Milk production was not affected by diets containing pea with triticale or pearl millet compared with control diets (25.2, 23.2, and 24.5 kg/d). Cows fed pea with triticale produced milk with a higher concentration of fat (4.59 vs. 3.35%) and more FCM (27.3 vs. 22.1 kg/d) than those fed the control diet. However, cows fed the control diet gained more BW than those receiving pea with triticale or pearl millet diets. Partitioning of energy between body stores and milk production was different between cows fed pea with triticale and control diets; however, total energy use was not different (32.4 vs. 30.5 Mcal of NEL/d). Differences in energy partitioning may have been caused partly by differences in ruminal fermentation of the respective diets.

Key Words: forage • digestibility • small grain • peas

Submitted on January 30, 1992
Accepted on June 15, 1992







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.