JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 1 317-325
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pecsok, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by McGilliard, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pecsok, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by McGilliard, M. L.

The Effect of Herd Milk Production on Scoring Dairy Herd Improvement Performance Measures

S. R. Pecsok 1, B. J. Conlin 1, G. R. Steuernagel 1, and M. L. McGilliard 2

1 Animal Science Department, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
2 Dairy Science Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061

Objectives of this research were to convert DHI performance measures into percentile scores based on expected values at a producer's rolling herd average and to compare performance with percentile scores based on means of all herds. Holstein herd data from the Minnesota Dairy Records Processing Center were used to derive regression coefficients to predict expected values of DHI management variables from three forms of rolling herd average 4% FCM. Variables were converted to percentiles using expected parameter value, assumption of normal distribution, and the mean square error of the prediction equation as an estimate of the variance.

With some exceptions in reproductive categories, expected values for DHI performance measures at the mean rolling herd average were generally better than expected values in lower producing herds and worse than expected values in higher producing herds. Absolute values for the 75th percentile of performance measures based on the mean of all herds translated to percentiles of 54 to 82 when scoring was based on expected values at the 75th percentile of rolling herd average. Electronically importing DHI data and converting to percentiles based on rolling herd average allowed for comparison of DHI performance measures with similar rather than all herds.

Key Words: dairy herd improvement • performance • evaluation • milk production

Submitted on July 12, 1991
Accepted on September 13, 1991







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.