JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 8 2515-2529
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Milgen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Milgen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, L. L.

A Compartmental Model to Analyze Ruminal Digestion

J. Van Milgen 1, M. R. Murphy 1, and L. L. Berger 1

1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801

In contrast to digestion models that include a discrete lag phase, a compartmental digestion model was proposed. It assumed the existence of a lag compartment and a digestion compartment. Substrate present in the digestion compartment was subject to first-order kinetics digestion. Flow of substrate from the lag compartment to the digestion compartment was proposed to be a first-order process and likely was affected by hydration of substrate, bacterial attachment, and colonization. The proposed model was compared with models that assumed the existence of a discrete lag phase. Parameter estimates for these models were obtained either through logarithmic transformation of data or nonlinear regression. Statistically, there was no difference between the compartmental model and the nonlinear model with a discrete lag phase. Differences in parameter estimates between these two models were small. Residual mean squares were higher for the logarithmically transformed models. Differences in parameter estimates between these models and the compartmental model depended on the structure of the experimental data. In a number of cases, the nonlinear parameters of the compartmental model converged to the same value, resulting in a different interpretation of the model. Residual mean squares for predicting rate of disappearance were lowest for the compartmental model.

Key Words: digestion • models • rumen • fermentation

Submitted on April 6, 1990
Accepted on December 6, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. J. Hackmann, J. D. Sampson, and J. N. Spain
Comparing relative feed value with degradation parameters of grass and legume forages
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2344 - 2356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. C. Ellis, M. Mahlooji, and J. H. Matis
Models for estimating parameters of neutral detergent fiber digestion by ruminal microorganisms
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2005; 83(7): 1591 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.