JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 7 2172-2179
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, M. K.

Milk Yield Variation Concurrent with Conception

E. D. Harwood 1, E. L. Jensen 1, D. A. Wieckert 1, and M. K. Clayton 2

1 Department of Dairy Science
2 Departments of Plant Pathology and Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Milk yield data from herds at the University of Illinois and the University of Wisconsin-Madison were used to characterize milk yield fluctuations concurrent with conception. Analyses were performed on 118 Illinois and 244 Wisconsin cows; milk yields were recorded for 15 d preceding confirmed conception. Conception was confirmed by calving within 11 d of 281 d postbreeding. Each cow's difference between 7-d rolling means for a.m. and p.m. milking yield was subtracted from a.m. yields as a diurnal adjustment. A pattern matching formula that was applied to adjusted yields ([b — a]/a, where a and b were sequential milkings) produced a mean calculated value for the milking nearest conception that was different from all milkings for 15 d preceding conception in Wisconsin data only. Discriminant analysis failed to differentiate between preceding and conception inclusive sequences of adjusted milk yields. Pattern matching formulas applied to individual cow data failed to isolate more than 2% of conceptions when the threshold value was set to eliminate false positives. Results demonstrated low predictive ability for conception using concurrent milk yield fluctuations despite implications of significant mean differences for values that were enhanced by pattern matching formulas.

Key Words: milk yield variation • conception • estrus

Submitted on September 4, 1990
Accepted on February 12, 1991







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.