JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 6 1993-2000
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamrozik, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jamrozik, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, L. R.

Procedures for Updating Solutions to Animal Models as Data Accumulate

J. Jamrozik 1 and L. R. Schaeffer 2

1 Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Agricultural Academy, AI. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059, Krakow, Poland
2 Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

Three methods of updating genetic evaluations from an animal model were compared with the method of using all data and pedigree information on the basis of accuracy and computing requirements. The proposed updating schemes were chosen to reduce computing costs while solving the mixed model equations by an indirect approach. Method 1 utilized observations from only the latest period along with pedigree information from all periods. Method 2 also utilized observations from only the latest period, but pedigree information was limited to only animals with data in the latest period. Both methods incorporated information on solutions and diagonal elements of mixed model equations from an analysis of data in previous periods. Method 3 used only data and pedigree information from the latest four periods. Results were compared with those from the ALL method, an analysis of all data and pedigree information from all periods. Method 1 was nearly the same as the ALL method in accuracy and in computing requirements, and, therefore, adoption of method 1 would not be warranted under the assumed model. Methods 2 and 3 were less accurate but required much less computing effort than the ALL method. None of the three updating schemes was deemed acceptable as a replacement to an analysis of all available data and pedigree information.

Key Words: updating • prediction • animal models

Submitted on November 8, 1990
Accepted on January 22, 1991







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.