JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 4 1170-1180
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, F. Y.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, F. Y.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. H.

Effect of Ultrafiltration Retentates and Whey Protein Concentrates on Ice Cream Quality During Storage

F. Y. Lee 1 and C. H. White 1

1 Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762

Ultrafiltration retentates (concentrated to three times) and whey protein concentrates were used to replace different levels of SNF in vanilla ice cream at 25,50, or 75% and 25, 50, 75, or 100%, respectively. All mixes were formulated to make an ice cream containing 12% fat, 9.7% SNF, 12% sucrose, 4% corn syrup solids, and .3% stabilizer-emulsifier. Ice cream mixes were evaluated for pH and viscosity after 24 h of aging. These mixes were processed through an HTST pilot plant system and a 4.73-L (5-qt) batch freezer at 80% overrun. The drawing temperature was measured at this time. The ice creams were evaluated for chemical composition, microbiological quality, and sensory properties at 1, 30, and 90 d of storage. Heat shock stability and meltdown properties were tested after 30 d of storage. The results showed that the pH was affected significantly (P < .05) by substitutions of whey protein concentrate and UF retentate. The pH and viscosity increased as the percentage of UF retentate substitution increased, but these two parameters decreased as the percentage of substitution with whey protein concentrate increased. Substitution with the concentrate at 75 and 100% significantly (P < .05) decreased the viscosity compared with the UF retentate products. The protein and lactose values were affected by replacing different levels of UF retentate in ice cream mixes. Protein values of 3.88 to 4.53% in UF retentate products were higher than those of ice cream with whey protein concentrate at 3.18 to 3.55% (P < .05). Sensory evaluation results showed that ice cream made with substitution of SNF with UF retentate had higher flavor and body and texture scores than that made with whey protein concentrate. Substitution with 25% UF retentate produced the highest mean flavor score of 8.31.

Key Words: retentate • ice cream • ultrafiltration

Submitted on July 13, 1990
Accepted on September 21, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S.-Y. Lim, B. G. Swanson, C. F. Ross, and S. Clark
High Hydrostatic Pressure Modification of Whey Protein Concentrate for Improved Body and Texture of Lowfat Ice Cream
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1308 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
V. B. Alvarez, C. L. Wolters, Y. Vodovotz, and T. Ji
Physical Properties of Ice Cream Containing Milk Protein Concentrates
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 862 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. W. Olson, C. H. White, and C. E. Watson
Properties of Frozen Dairy Desserts Processed by Microfluidization of their Mixes
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1157 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.