JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 3 1069-1077
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berger, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berger, P. J.

Reliability of Sire Evaluations for Calving Ease by a Threshold Model Analysis

P. Jeffrey Berger 1

1 Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011

Two approximate formulas for calculating reliability of evaluations for calving ease by a threshold model are presented. Approximations are based on the upper and lower bounds of true reliability from progeny data and then adjusted by the weighted average reliability of evaluations of sires and maternal grandsires of bulls with progeny information. Each approximation was applied in two data sets small enough so that the predicted reliability could be compared with the expected reliability from a complete inverse of the threshold model equations. Data set l had 280 bulls with progeny and a range in expected reliability of 4 to 96%. The range in expected reliability for the 374 bulls in data set 2 was from 66 to 94%. Predicted reliability by the approximate formulas was compared for progeny data alone and with the addition of pedigree information through the inverse of the relationship matrix. Mean square error of predicted reliability was reduced by including pedigree information, 69.4 and 16.3% in data sets 1 and 2, respectively. Approximate formulas tended to overpredict expected reliability by as much as 14% (data set 1) or 7% (data set 2), but reliability was less severely overpredicted when both the sire and maternal grandsire had progeny data (6 and 5% in data sets 1 and 2, respectively).

Key Words: reliability • threshold model • calving ease

Submitted on December 11, 1989
Accepted on September 17, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. R. Wiggans, S. Tsuruta, and I. Misztal
Technical Note: Adaptation of an Animal-Model Method for Approximation of Reliabilities to a Sire-Maternal Grandsire Model
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 4058 - 4061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. B. Cole, R. C. Goodling Jr., G. R. Wiggans, and P. M. VanRaden
Genetic Evaluation of Calving Ease for Brown Swiss and Jersey Bulls from Purebred and Crossbred Calvings
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1529 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.