JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 2 623-628
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powell, R. L.

Impact of Imported Daughters on Evaluations of Their Sires

R. L. Powell 1

1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705

Degree of bias in Modified Contemporary Comparison evaluations from including imported daughter was investigated to determine its impact on sire evaluation and subsequent development of conversion formulas between countries. Separate Modified Contemporary Deviations were computed from all daughters, only daughters with US dams, and only daughters with Canadian dams (daughters considered to be imported) for 31 Canadian Holstein bulls with a Repeatability of at least 40% in each subset. The deviations from daughters of Canadian dams were lower than those from daughters of US dams. Deviations weighted by product of Repeatabilities were significantly lower for both milk (113 kg) and fat (2.5 kg) for the subset of imported daughters. Lower evaluations for Canadian bulls did not affect conversion factors appreciably because 88% of daughters had US dams. However, demonstrations of bias (apparently due to merit of mates) led to implementation of separate Canadian unknown-parent groups in animal model evaluations. For unknown dams of recently born cows, PTA for milk yield were about 250 kg lower for Canadian dams than for US dams. Daughter yield deviations averaged only 10 kg milk and .1 kg fat less for daughters of Canadian dams than for daughters of US dams. Correlations between subsets of daughters were near 1.

Key Words: sire evaluation • bias • merit of mates

Submitted on April 6, 1990
Accepted on August 27, 1990







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.