JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 10 3454-3456
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graves, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graves, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, T. L.

Evaluation of Uterine Body and Bilateral Uterine Horn Insemination Techniques

W. M. Graves 1, H. H. Dowlen 2, G. A. Kiess 2, and T. L. Riley 3

1 Agricultural Extension Service, The University of Tennessee, PO Box 110019, Nashville 37222-0019
2 Dairy Experiment Station, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, The University of Tennessee, Lewisburg 37091
3 Tennessee Select Sires, Chester Stephens Road, Franklin 37064

Uterine body and bilateral horn insemination techniques were compared in 364 Jersey cows and 138 heifers by two inseminators. For horn inseminations, approximately one-half of the semen was placed in left uterine horn just prior to the point of resistance. The remainder of semen was then placed in the right uterine horn just prior to the point of resistance. Animals were inseminated in the uterine body on even days of the month throughout the study. On odd days of the month, animals were inseminated in both uterine horns. A total of 62.9% of 286 animals inseminated in the uterine body were pregnant versus 54.2% of 216 animals inseminated in both uterine horns. Differences were greater for cows than for heifers and at first and second services than at third or greater services. These results favor current recommended techniques to deposit semen into the uterine body correctly.

Key Words: horn breeding • artificial insemination technique • site of insemination

Submitted on March 14, 1991
Accepted on May 6, 1991




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. M. DeJarnette, C. E. Marshall, R. W. Lenz, D. R. Monke, W. H. Ayars, and C. G. Sattler
Sustaining the Fertility of Artificially Inseminated Dairy Cattle: The Role of the Artificial Insemination Industry
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E93 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.