JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 74 No. 1 50-57
© 1991 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srilaorkul, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Srilaorkul, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, F.

Effect of Ultrafiltration of Skim Milk on Casein Micelle Size Distribution in Retentate

S. Srilaorkul 1, L. Ozimek 1, B. Ooraikul 1, D. Hadziyev 1, and F. Wolfe 1

1 Department of Food Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5

Casein micelles obtained from skim milk concentrated three or five times by UF were mixed with agar and embedded in resin, and their thin sections were examined by transmission electron microscopy. The examination revealed roughly spherical particles with a wide range of sizes similar to the range of sizes found in unaltered skim milk. However, there was a significant change in casein micelle size distribution when the milk was ultrafiltered to higher concentrations. The highest proportion of casein micelles was changed from the 80- to 100-nm range in skim milk to 60 to 80-nm in milk concentrated five times. At higher concentrations, the numbers of casein micelles with diameters less than 80 nm increased, but those with diameters greater than 100 nm decreased. Consequently, both the volume distribution and the average diameter of the casein micelles were altered. There was a decrease in casein micelle diameter from 118 nm in normal skim milk to 92 and 87 nm in milk concentrated three or five times, respectively. The change in the composition of casein and minerals, particularly Ca and P, as a result of UF may be responsible for the change in casein micelle size distribution, volume distribution, and average diameter of the casein micelles.

Key Words: ultrafiltration • casein micelle size • retentate

Submitted on February 8, 1990
Accepted on July 23, 1990







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.