JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73 No. 8 2206-2213
© 1990 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tempelman, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burnside, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tempelman, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burnside, E. B.

Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variation for Production Traits in Canadian Holsteins

R. J. Tempelman 1 and E. B. Burnside 1

1 Centre for the Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada NlG 2W1

Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated for milk and fat yield in Canadian Holsteins using derivative-free REML procedures. Traits were analyzed under two sire and dam models differing in assumptions on the data structure. Within herd, dam relationships were first defined to be hierarchical within sire to estimate the two genetic variances, assuming no maternal, epistatic genetic, or other biases on the estimates. The potential impact of some of these biases was estimated as the difference between the two parental variances under a cross-classified model. Heritabilities based on sire components from both models were statistically identical and were .41 for milk yield and .32 for fat yield. Dominance genetic variance was 25% of the total variation for fat yield but was unimportant for milk yield based on approximate standard errors. However, results from the cross-classified model indicated dam components were significantly greater by 4% than sire components for fat yield. Therefore, hierarchical estimates of dominance genetic variance for fat yield may be biased upward. Some form of nonadditive genetic variation for fat yield, other than that based on sire components, may require consideration in dairy cattle breeding programs.

Key Words: heritability • dominance genetic variation • production

Submitted on August 31, 1989
Accepted on January 26, 1990







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.