JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73 No. 5 1166-1172
© 1990 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, M. E.

Comparative Evaluation of Bulk Starter Substrates on Activity and Storage of Two Commercial Starter Strains

Tineke H. Jones, Lech Ozimek and Michael E. Stiles

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P5

Two out of five commercial strains of Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris were selected for their sensitivity or insensitivity to acidity based on growth and storage in 10% reconstituted skim milk. It was shown that both the acid-sensitive and acid-insensitive strains were protected when grown and stored in skim milk media with solids content increased by UF or by added solids (20% or 24% reconstituted skim milk). Internal pH medium was used as a reference for protective growth and storage of lactic starter cultures. Maintenance of activity over 5 d of storage at 2°C in 24% reconstituted skim milk and UF milk retentate (concentrated 3x) was better than or equal to internal pH medium for both strains of L. lactis ssp. cremoris.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.