JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73 No. 2 532-538
© 1990 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, G. W.

A Utility Function for Ranking Sires That Considers Production, Linear Type Traits, Semen Cost, and Risk

G. W. Rogers 1

1 Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

A procedure was developed to rank AI sires on utility. The utility function considered transmitting abilities for production, udder depth, teat placement; and foot angle, semen cost, timing of costs and revenues, gene flow, and risk. Weights for type traits relative to production and risk aversion were based on the literature. A three-generation planning horizon was used. Utility was expressed relative to an average first evaluation non-AI sire. Moderate change in the relative weights of production versus the type traits (3:1 versus 2:1) had little effect on sire rankings (rank correlations above .97). The effect of changing risk aversion on sire rankings was subtle except when risk aversion was increased to high levels (three times average levels reported in literature). Rank correlation between semen utility based on 7 units of semen required to produce a heifer at calving age and nine units of semen required to produce a heifer at calving age (and corresponding expected calving intervals) was .98. However, the correlation between semen utility based on 5 and 9 units was .91. Similar parameters could be used in ranking sires on utility for many producers. The procedure developed ranked sires differently than indices currently available.

Key Words: sire selection • risk • semen utility

Submitted on February 27, 1989
Accepted on August 24, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. R. Tozer and J. R. Stokes
Producer Breeding Objectives and Optimal Sire Selection
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2002; 85(12): 3518 - 3525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.