JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73 No. 12 3563-3566
© 1990 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaster, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaster, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. L.

Feeding Acidified or Sweet Milk Replacer to Dairy Calves

E. H. Jaster 1, G. C. McCoy 1, T. Tomkins 1, and C. L. Davis 1

1 Department of Animal Sciences, university of Illinois, Urbana 61801

The objective of this study was to compare performance of calves fed acidified milk replacer or regular (sweet) milk replacer twice daily at 10% of BW. Thirty-seven female Holstein calves were fed replacers reconstituted to 12.5% DM for 4 wk At 28 d, half of the amounts of milk replacer consumed during wk 4 were fed during wk 5 and calves weaned from replacer at d 35 of age. A pelleted starter feed was offered for ad libitum access throughout the 42-d trial. Body weight was recorded at birth, d 3 of age, and weekly thereafter. Fecal consistency scores were recorded. Other parameters were measured on d 3 and 42. Average daily gains (d 3 to 42) for calves fed sweet and acidified milk replacers were .33 and .38 kg/d. Starter consumption was similar for both treatments. Calves fed acidified milk replacer (d 3 to 28) had a lower (1.4 vs. 1.6) fecal consistency score than those fed sweet milk replacer (scale of 1 to 4, 1 = normal and 4 = watery). Benefits of feeding acidified milk replacer at 10% of BW per day may be in reducing the incidence of some infectious scours, although further experiments are needed to verify this.

Key Words: dairy calves • acidified milk replacer • sweet milk replacer

Submitted on March 9, 1990
Accepted on May 18, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. A. Moore, J. Taylor, M. L. Hartman, and W. M. Sischo
Quality assessments of waste milk at a calf ranch
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3503 - 3509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Raeth-Knight, H. Chester-Jones, S. Hayes, J. Linn, R. Larson, D. Ziegler, B. Ziegler, and N. Broadwater
Impact of conventional or intensive milk replacer programs on Holstein heifer performance through six months of age and during first lactation
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2009; 92(2): 799 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.