JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 73 No. 12 3472-3480
© 1990 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, N. E.

Comparison of a Standardized and Variable Milking Routine

Morten Dam Rasmussen 1, Erik S. Frimer 1, Zoltan Horvath 2, and Niels Einar Jensen 3

1 National Institute of Animal Science, Department of Research in Cattle and Sheep, Foulum, PO Box 39, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
2 National Dairy Research Institute, Roskildevej, DK-3400 Hilleroed, Denmark
3 National Veterinary Laboratory, Hangoevej 2, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark

Effects of premilking udder preparation and the interval from beginning of udder preparation until machine attachment were measured on complete lactation milk performance, milkability, milk quality, udder health, and operator working conditions of two groups of Danish Black and White cows: 1) 31 cows received 31 ± 9 s of premilking stimulation with an interval of 1.22 ± .25 min (standard routine), and 2) 31 cows received 17 ± 5 s of premilking stimulation and a variable interval of 3.06 ± 1.56 min (control routine). Cows milked by the standard routine yielded 1.3 kg of 4% FCM more per day than did those cows milked by the control routine. This difference in lactation milk yield was mainly due to cows on the standard routine maintaining a higher fat percentage throughout the lactation. Control cows had a higher peak milk flow rate and shorter machine-on time, but the time from beginning of stimulation until removal of the machine was longer. The additional teat washing decreased the total bacterial counts and content of anaerobic spores in the milk. No difference in udder health was found between the two groups. Proposals for standard milking routines in tie stalls and in milking parlors are given.

Key Words: milking routine • stimulation • milk quality

Submitted on December 4, 1989
Accepted on April 19, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. M. Svennersten-Sjaunja and G. Pettersson
Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 37 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
V. Tancin, A. H. Ipema, and P. Hogewerf
Interaction of Somatic Cell Count and Quarter Milk Flow Patterns
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2223 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Weiss and R. M. Bruckmaier
Optimization of Individual Prestimulation in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 137 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.