HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Graham, E. F. Articles by Graham, J. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Graham, E. F. Articles by Graham, J. K.

The Effect of Whole Ejaculate Filtration on the Morphology and the Fertility of Bovine Semen

Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16801

A Sephadex G-15 filtration method was developed to remove abnormal and nonmotile bull sperm from an entire ejaculate. The efficiency of filtration was determined by adding freeze-killed sperm to the ejaculate or using ejaculates with elevated numbers of abnormal cells induced by scrotal insulation. A fertility trial, using split ejaculates, compared fertility of filtered and unfiltered semen.

After filtration, samples with 0, 25, and 50% killed cells added contained 77 to 81% motile cells. Addition of 75% killed sperm resulted in significant decrease (52%) of motile cells following filtration. Morphologic examination of semen with elevated numbers of abnormal cells revealed higher percentages of sperm with normal shaped heads and normal or swollen acrosomes after filtration than in unfiltered samples. Percentage of pear-shaped heads, lifted acrosomes, and bent tails decreased after filtration. Six high fertility and six low fertility bulls were used to evaluate fertility of filtered semen. Filtering increased motile sperm from 51 to 57% and from 36 to 50% for the high and low fertility bulls, respectively. The 60- to 90-d nonreturn rates for high fertility bulls were not increased by filtering (73 vs. 72%). However, filtering significantly improved the nonreturn rates for the low fertility bulls (61 vs. 67%).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Marti, R. Perez-Pe, T. Muino-Blanco, and J. A. Cebrian-Perez Comparative Study of Four Different Sperm Washing Methods Using Apoptotic Markers in Ram Spermatozoa J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 746 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]