JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 72 No. 6 1569-1577
© 1989 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeschele, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gianola, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hoeschele, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gianola, D.

Bayesian Versus Maximum Quasi-Likelihood Methods for Sire Evaluation with Categorical Data

Ina Hoeschele

Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061

Daniel Gianola

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801

ABSTRACT

Binary variables arising from an underlying normal distribution with a fixed threshold were simulated in a two-stage selection scheme with a sire model. The model had herd-year-seasons and groups as fixed effects and sires as random variables; a heritability of .25 was used in the simulation. The "best" 20% of the sires were allowed to have additional progeny in the second stage. The criteria used to select these sires were breeding values predicted with a Bayesian procedure or with a maximum quasi-likelihood approach. Heritability was estimated from the data used to compute the sire evaluations. The two methods were compared in terms of empirical sampling bias, variance, and mean squared error of estimates of fixed effects and of heritability. The ability of selection based on the two methods to elicit genetic change was studied in terms of realized response to sire selection. Under the conditions examined, the maximum quasi-likelihood procedure had a larger mean squared error of estimates of heritability and of differences between genetic groups. Heritability estimates were biased upwardly by both methods. Differences between true transmitting abilities of bulls selected by each of the methods were negligible. It appears that sire evaluations for categorical data obtained with the Bayesian method are not improved upon by maximum quasi-likelihood.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Hansen, M. S. Lund, J. Pedersen, and L. G. Christensen
Genetic Parameters for Stillbirth in Danish Holstein Cows Using a Bayesian Threshold Model
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2004; 87(3): 706 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.