HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rotz, C. A. Articles by Black, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rotz, C. A. Articles by Black, J. R.

DAFOSYM: A Dairy Forage System Model for Evaluating Alternatives in Forage Conservation¹

Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824

ABSTRACT

The dairy forage system model, DAFOSYM, is a simulation model designed to evaluate technologies and management strategies on representative dairy farms. The model integrates crop growth, harvest, storage, feeding, animal utilization, and economic analysis. Corn and alfalfa growth are simulated using historical weather data. Alfalfa harvest includes mowing, field curing, raking, baling, and chopping; losses and quality changes are modeled as functions of the mechanical treatment, field curing time, and weather. Storage losses and quality changes are functions of the type of storage and the crop moisture content. Stored feeds are supplemented with soybean meal, distiller's grain, corn grain, and purchased hay to provide balanced diets for a given herd. Costs of crop production, machinery, storage facilities, labor, and purchased feeds are subtracted from the income of milk and excess feed sales to determine a measure of return. Simulation over many years of weather conditions is used to evaluate the long-term benefit and risk of a technology or strategy on a representative dairy farm. The model helps identify the best strategy for forage production and allocation to a dairy herd. The most appropriate type, size, and number of storage facilities, and the appropriately sized forage harvesting equipment are determined for a representative dairy farm.

¹ Invited paper.

² US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.

³ Department of Agricultural Engineering.

⁴ US Dairy Forage Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

⁵ Department of Agricultural Economics.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Rotz, F. Taube, M. P. Russelle, J. Oenema, M. A. Sanderson, and M. Wachendorf Whole-Farm Perspectives of Nutrient Flows in Grassland Agriculture Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2139 - 2159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Rotz, D. R. Buckmaster, and J. W. Comerford A beef herd model for simulating feed intake, animal performance, and manure excretion in farm systems J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 231 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Shalloo, P. Dillon, M. Rath, and M. Wallace Description and Validation of the Moorepark Dairy System Model J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1945 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Rotz, A. N. Sharpley, L. D. Satter, W. J. Gburek, and M. A. Sanderson Production and Feeding Strategies for Phosphorus Management on Dairy Farms J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2002; 85(11): 3142 - 3153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Giasson, R. B. Bryant, and N. L. Bills Environmental and Economic Optimization of Dairy Manure Management: A Mathematical Programming Approach Agron. J., July 1, 2002; 94(4): 757 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Sanderson, C. A. Rotz, S. W. Fultz, and E. B. Rayburn Estimating Forage Mass with a Commercial Capacitance Meter, Rising Plate Meter, and Pasture Ruler Agron. J., November 1, 2001; 93(6): 1281 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.A. Rotz, G. W. Roth, K. J. Soder, and R. R. Schnabel Economic and Environmental Implications of Soybean Production and Use on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 418 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]