JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 72 No. 11 2921-2927
© 1989 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hacker, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hacker, R. R.

Effect of Chronobiological Manipulation of Lactation in the Dairy Cow

N. M. Evans and R. R. Hacker

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine if chronobiological manipulation of the environment through the use of skeletal photoperiods could enhance milk production of the dairy cow. Cows in their 8th mo of gestation were maintained in either a control light regimen (12 to 13 h continuous light) or three skeletal photoperiods exposed to a total of 8 h of light. Cows in the skeletal photoperiods received 6 h of light from 0500 to 1100 h and a 2 h light pulse between 1500 and 1700 h (pulse 1500 to 1700 h), 1800 and 2000 h (pulse 1800 to 2000 h), or 2100 and 2300 h (pulse 2100 to 2300 h). Cows were milked twice daily and milk weights recorded. Weekly milk samples were analyzed for fat, protein, lactose, and SCC. Milk progesterone was monitored for the first 60 d after calving to determine return to estrus. Total electrical consumption for lighting the different light regimens were monitored throughout the lactation. Cows in the light regimen of pulse 1800 to 2000 h exhibited a higher persistency of lactation and a higher feed efficiency than the cows in the other light regimens. There were no differences between treatments in milk fat, protein, lactose, or SCC. The total electricity used to light pulse 1800 to 2000 h was 50% less than that used to light the control light regimen. It is concluded that light is essential between 13 to 15 h after subjective dawn for increasing persistency of lactation. Further, milk production of the dairy cow can be profitably enhanced through the use of chronobiological principles.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
V. R. Osborne, N. E. Odongo, A. M. Edwards, and B. W. McBride
Effects of Photoperiod and Glucose-Supplemented Drinking Water on the Performance of Dairy Calves
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5199 - 5207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.