JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 71 No. 5 1310-1318
© 1988 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westell, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Vleck, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Westell, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Van Vleck, L. D.

Genetic Groups in an Animal Model

R. A. Westell, R. L. Quaas and L. D. Van Vleck

Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

ABSTRACT

Rules are presented for assigning coefficients to the genetic group portion(s) of the mixed model equations after transformation to solve directly for total genetic value (group plus animal solutions) simultaneously for sires and cows using an animal model. Inclusion of all known relationships seems to reduce the need for groups to account for genetic selection and genetic trend. Migration of animals into a population, however, results in a need for grouping to account for genetic merit of the migrants. Selection of parents on which records are not available also creates a need for grouping. Group solutions represent the average genetic merit of phantom (unidentified, or represented by only one descendant) animals selected to be parents that do not have records available. Groups can be cross-classified with time and the genetic path of selection. The total genetic value for every animal includes a function of genetic groups. The function of genetic groups is specific for each individual animal and depends on the number of generations to the base phantom ancestors and on the genetic groups to which those phantom ancestors are assigned. The group coefficients presented account for genetic selection that cannot be defined by known genetic relationships.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. L. Bennett
Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2093 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Hickey, M. G. Keane, D. A. Kenny, A. R. Cromie, H. A. Mulder, and R. F. Veerkamp
Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1047 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. P. Sanchez, I. Misztal, I. Aguilar, and J. K. Bertrand
Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 267 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. L. Sapp, W. Zhang, J. K. Bertrand, and R. Rekaya
Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2391 - 2400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Casellas, G. Caja, A. Ferret, and J. Piedrafita
Analysis of litter size and days to lambing in the Ripollesa ewe. I. Comparison of models with linear and threshold approaches
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 618 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. D. Snowder, L. D. Van Vleck, L. V. Cundiff, and G. L. Bennett
Influence of breed, heterozygosity, and disease incidence on estimates of variance components of respiratory disease in preweaned beef calves
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(6): 1247 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. D. Van Vleck, K. J. Hanford, and G. D. Snowder
Lack of evidence for cytoplasmic effects for four traits of Polypay sheep
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 552 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. I. Weller and E. Ezra
Genetic Analysis of the Israeli Holstein Dairy Cattle Population for Production and Nonproduction Traits with a Multitrait Animal Model
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1519 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. J. Hanford, G. D. Snowder, and L. D. Van Vleck
Models with nuclear, cytoplasmic, and environmental effects for production traits of Columbia sheep
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2003; 81(8): 1926 - 1932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. D. Van Vleck, G. D. Snowder, and K. J. Hanford
Models with cytoplasmic effects for birth, weaning, and fleece weights, and litter size at birth for a population of Targhee sheep
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 61 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Genetic Evaluation by Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Using Marker and Trait Information in a Multibreed Population
Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 507 - 516.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.