|
|
||||||||
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
ABSTRACT
Rules are presented for assigning coefficients to the genetic group portion(s) of the mixed model equations after transformation to solve directly for total genetic value (group plus animal solutions) simultaneously for sires and cows using an animal model. Inclusion of all known relationships seems to reduce the need for groups to account for genetic selection and genetic trend. Migration of animals into a population, however, results in a need for grouping to account for genetic merit of the migrants. Selection of parents on which records are not available also creates a need for grouping. Group solutions represent the average genetic merit of phantom (unidentified, or represented by only one descendant) animals selected to be parents that do not have records available. Groups can be cross-classified with time and the genetic path of selection. The total genetic value for every animal includes a function of genetic groups. The function of genetic groups is specific for each individual animal and depends on the number of generations to the base phantom ancestors and on the genetic groups to which those phantom ancestors are assigned. The group coefficients presented account for genetic selection that cannot be defined by known genetic relationships.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. L. Bennett Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2093 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Hickey, M. G. Keane, D. A. Kenny, A. R. Cromie, H. A. Mulder, and R. F. Veerkamp Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1047 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Sanchez, I. Misztal, I. Aguilar, and J. K. Bertrand Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 267 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Sapp, W. Zhang, J. K. Bertrand, and R. Rekaya Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2391 - 2400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Casellas, G. Caja, A. Ferret, and J. Piedrafita Analysis of litter size and days to lambing in the Ripollesa ewe. I. Comparison of models with linear and threshold approaches J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 618 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Snowder, L. D. Van Vleck, L. V. Cundiff, and G. L. Bennett Influence of breed, heterozygosity, and disease incidence on estimates of variance components of respiratory disease in preweaned beef calves J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(6): 1247 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Van Vleck, K. J. Hanford, and G. D. Snowder Lack of evidence for cytoplasmic effects for four traits of Polypay sheep J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 552 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Weller and E. Ezra Genetic Analysis of the Israeli Holstein Dairy Cattle Population for Production and Nonproduction Traits with a Multitrait Animal Model J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1519 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Hanford, G. D. Snowder, and L. D. Van Vleck Models with nuclear, cytoplasmic, and environmental effects for production traits of Columbia sheep J Anim Sci, August 1, 2003; 81(8): 1926 - 1932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Van Vleck, G. D. Snowder, and K. J. Hanford Models with cytoplasmic effects for birth, weaning, and fleece weights, and litter size at birth for a population of Targhee sheep J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 61 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Genetic Evaluation by Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Using Marker and Trait Information in a Multibreed Population Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 507 - 516. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |