JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 71 No. 4 1050-1057
© 1988 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Arendonk, J. A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Arendonk, J. A. M.

Management Guides for Insemination and Replacement Decisions

Johan A. M. Van Arendonk

Department of Animal Breeding, Agricultural University, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands

ABSTRACT

Decisions to inseminate and replace cows should be based on expected future income. Two management guides are described to help dairy farmers make decisions 1) profit after conception for decisions on insemination and 2) future profitability for decisions on immediate replacement and veterinary treatment. Management guides are obtained by comparing expected cash flow of a cow currently in the herd with that of a replacement heifer entering the herd at different times. Besides optimum decisions, management guides indicate expected loss when making an nonoptimum decision. This allows farmers to weigh additional information on cow or herd and to rank cows on expected profitability.

Dynamic programming can be used to calculate management guides for all possible states of a cow for a given price and production situation. Results can be used to derive management guides for individual cows in a herd, characterizing each cow by state variables. Most information needed on cows can be taken from milk recording data and breeding records. Lactation number, milk production, and stage of lactation clearly affect the management guides.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. L. de Maturana, E. Ugarte, and O. Gonzalez-Recio
Impact of Calving Ease on Functional Longevity and Herd Amortization Costs in Basque Holsteins Using Survival Analysis
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4451 - 4457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. L. de Maturana, E. Ugarte, J. Komen, and J. A. M. van Arendonk
Consequences of Selection for Yield Traits on Calving Ease Performance
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2497 - 2505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. Groenendaal, D. T. Galligan, and H. A. Mulder
An Economic Spreadsheet Model to Determine Optimal Breeding and Replacement Decisions for Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2146 - 2157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.