JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 69 No. 12 3094-3099
© 1986 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dellmeier, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dellmeier, G. R.

Effect of Feeding Method on Nonnutritive Oral Activities in Holstein Calves1

M. B. Kopp, T. H. Friend and G. R. Dellmeier

Department of Animal Science, Texas A & M Univeristy, College Station 77843

ABSTRACT

Forty Holstein heifer calves were assigned to be fed whole milk from either bucket, bucket with pacifier, nipple bottle, or nipple bottle with pacifier. The pacifier was a nursing bottle with an unperforated nipple. Calves were housed in individual hutches and fed twice daily. Calves were 3 d of age at first observation and were observed biweekly until 42 d of age. Observations were conducted beginning at either 1000 or 1400 h from September through March. A novel object (bicycle inner tube), selected to serve as a focal object for the sucking drive, was placed in the calf's environment and calf behaviors observed during the next 5 min.

Time of observation did not influence nonnutritive oral behaviors (sniffing, licking, sucking, chewing, oral grooming, and nose licking). Time spent in nonnutritive oral behaviors increased with age. Regardless of availability of a pacifier, bucket-fed calves spent more time in sniffing the focal object than bottle-fed calves. Calves with access to pacifiers sucked other objects more than calves without pacifiers. The more curious animals spent more time involved in nonnutritive oral behaviors.


FOOTNOTES

1 Technical Article TA 21168 from the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
I. Veissier, A. M. de Passille, G. Despres, J. Rushen, I. Charpentier, A. R. Ramirez de la Fe, and P. Pradel
Does nutritive and non-nutritive sucking reduce other oral behaviors and stimulate rest in calves?
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2574 - 2587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.