JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 69 No. 12 3063-3073
© 1986 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St. Pierre, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by St. Pierre, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, W. R.

Incorporation of Uncertainty in Composition of Feeds into Least-Cost Ration Models. 2. Joint-Chance Constrained Programming1

N. R. St. Pierre2 and W. R. Harvey

Department of Dairy Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210

ABSTRACT

Least-cost formulation of livestock rations and mixes by linear programming techniques assumes a perfect knowledge of the composition of each available ingredient. This assumption cannot hold in practical situations. When more than one nutrient is considered imperfectly known (random), there exists a deterministic equivalent from the family of joint-chance constrained programming problems. The theory is reviewed first; from this theory four models are proposed for the formulation of a supplement feed. The first model represents what is considered an industry standard. The second model is a linear approximation to the original problem and is solved by linear programming techniques. The last two models make use of a Bonferroni inequality but must be solved by nonlinear programming techniques. Fifteen ingredients were considered; their prices from 1970 to 1979 were published. Over the 10-yr period, cost of ingredients per ton of mix averaged $135.27, $134.82, $127.05, and $126.24 for the four models, respectively. Therefore, a $9.03 (6.7%) reduction in ingredient costs can be expected for the feed industry with the adoption of these techniques. However, a nonlinear programming algorithm must be used, which is not available and "friendly" as current least-cost computer software.


FOOTNOTES

1 Salaries and research support provided by state and federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Journal Article Number 222-85.

2 On leave from Government of Canada, Department of Agriculture, Research Station, Lennoxville, Quebec, Canada JIM 1Z3.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.