HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rakes, A. H. Articles by Whitlow, L. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rakes, A. H. Articles by Whitlow, L. W.

Effects of Adding Beta-Carotene to Rations of Lactating Cows Consuming Different Forages^1,2,

Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695

ABSTRACT

Thirty-six Holstein cows fed a corn silage-based ration and 34 fed an alfalfa-grass silage-based ration were assigned according to calving date to receive either 300 mg/head per day of synthetic beta-carotene in a gelatin capsule or an empty gelatin capsule daily for the first 100 days postpartum. Supplemental vitamin A was provided at 3919 IU/kg of ration dry matter. Cervix diameters for cows supplemented with beta-carotene were smaller at 21 days and 28 days postpartum. Days from parturition to first observed estrus were less when beta-carotene was added and less when corn silage was fed. Means of other reproductive traits were more favorable for cows treated with beta-carotene (fewer services per conception and shorter intervals between parturition and conception). Milk progesterone at 21 and 28 days postpartum was not affected by either roughage or beta-carotene treatment. Milk from cows receiving alfalfa-grass silage contained lower somatic cell concentrations than that produced by cows fed corn silage. Milk somatic cell concentrations were lower in both roughage treatment groups for cows supplemented with beta-carotene. No effects of roughage or beta-carotene on milk production or milk fat percentages were significant.

¹ Paper No. 9370 of the Journal Series of North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh 27695. Use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.

² Supported in part by a grant from Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., Nutley, NJ.