JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 68 No. 1 86-90
© 1985 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petitclerc, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petitclerc, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, H. A.

Mammary Growth Response of Holstein Heifers to Photoperiod1

D. Petitclerc2, R. D. Kineman, S. A. Zinn and H. A. Tucker

Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824

ABSTRACT

Two groups of 10 prepubertal Holstein heifers (86 kg initial body weight) and two groups of 10 postpubertal heifers (292 kg initial body weight) each were maintained under 8 h light: 16 h dark or 16 light: 8 dark photoperiods for an average of 139 days. Then animals were slaughtered, and the total right half of the mammary gland was removed. Mammary parenchymal tissue was separated from surrounding adipose and connective tissue (extraparenchymal tissue). There was no effect of photoperiod on total weight of the mammary gland (parenchymal plus extraparenchymal portions). In contrast, mammary parenchymal weight increased 40 and 30% in prepubertal and postpubertal heifers exposed to 16 light:8 dark as compared with heifers exposed to 8 light:16 dark. Similarly, mammary parenchymal tissue of heifers given 16 light:8 dark contained 68 and 35% more total deoxyribonucleic acid (an index of cell numbers) than heifers exposed to 8 light:16 dark. However, photoperiod did not influence concentrations of deoxyribonucleic acid or fat in parenchymal tissue. Extraparenchymal tissue weight was 12 to 35% less in heifers given 16 light:8 dark than in heifers exposed to 8 light:16 dark. We conclude that 16 light:8 dark stimulates the mammary parenchymal tissue to grow into the fat pad (extraparenchymal tissue) of prepubertal and postpubertal Holstein heifers.


FOOTNOTES

1 Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Article No. 11266. This research was supported in part by USDA Grants 901-15-2 and 59-2261-0-2-012-0 and USPHS Grant HD 17738.

2 On leave from Lennoxville Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Lennoxville, Quebec, Canada J1M 1Z3.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
V. R. Osborne, N. E. Odongo, A. M. Edwards, and B. W. McBride
Effects of Photoperiod and Glucose-Supplemented Drinking Water on the Performance of Dairy Calves
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5199 - 5207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. G. Rius and G. E. Dahl
Exposure to long-day photoperiod prepubertally may increase milk yield in first-lactation cows.
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2080 - 2083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. J. Collier, G. E. Dahl, and M. J. VanBaale
Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle.
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1244 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.