JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67 No. 3 585-591
© 1984 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanida, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hohenboken, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanida, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hohenboken, W. D.

Effect of Artificial Photoperiod on Eating Behavior and Other Behavioral Observations of Dairy Cows1

H. Tanida, L. V. Swanson and W. D. Hohenboken2

Department of Animal Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331

2 Reprint requests.

ABSTRACT

Twenty-eight cows were assigned randomly to a daily photoperiod of 18 h light and 6 h darkness or to continuous light and were observed 1 day each month from December 1981 to February 1982. Lighting regimen did not affect eating behavior or milk production. Overall means of total eating time, number of eating bouts, and average time eating per bout on the 3 observation days were 270 to 280 min, 10 to 12 times, and 24 to 27 min. Eating behavior and milk production were not significantly correlated. Eating patterns were similar in both groups and across observation days. Peaks of eating activity occurred before sunset, bracketing the evening milking and after the offering of fresh feed in the morning. Approximately 80% of total eating activity occurred between 0900 and 2100 h in both groups. Cows had a clear preference for entry into the right or left side of the milking parlor, and entry order was repeatable. Milking order and milk production were not correlated. In one group, location of free stalls did not influence utilization; but in the other group, centrally located stalls were utilized more than stalls at either end of the alley. About 40% of cows had individual free stall preferences.


FOOTNOTES

1 Technical Paper No. 6779, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rotger, A. Ferret, X. Manteca, J. L. R. de la Torre, and S. Calsamiglia
Effects of dietary nonstructural carbohydrates and protein sources on feeding behavior of tethered heifers fed high-concentrate diets
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2006; 84(5): 1197 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. J. DeVries, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and K. A. Beauchemin
Short Communication: Diurnal Feeding Pattern of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 4079 - 4082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.