JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67 No. 10 2475-2480
© 1984 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stommes, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stommes, R. C.

Yield and Quality of Alfalfa as Affected by Harvesting and Storage Methods1

D. G. Johnson, D. E. Otterby, R. G. Lundquist, J. A. True, F. A. Benson, R. E. Smith, L. K. Lindor and R. C. Stommes

West Central Experiment Station, Morris, MN 56267
and Departments of Animal Science, Agricultural Engineering, and Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108

ABSTRACT

Losses in harvesting and storage were determined for several methods of packaging alfalfa hay. Swathing or swathing and raking had little effect on losses of dry matter or on protein content. Alfalfa put up as silage, stacks, rectangular bales (25 kg), large round bales (544 kg), and small round bales (295 kg) retained 90.1, 89.4, 83.5, 69.8, and 67.4% of dry matter potentially available. Silage and rectangular bales of first crop alfalfa were higher in protein than small round bales. Large round bales retained over 95% of dry matter during storage. Stacks of alfalfa retained 85% of dry matter when stored outside for 6 to 7 mo and 90.4% of dry matter when stored under roof with open sides. Recovery of dry matter from rectangular bales stored under roof was 101% for first crop material and 87.4% for second crop.


FOOTNOTES

1 Scientific Journal Series Paper No. 13.671 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, St. Paul 55108.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D.W. Hancock and M. Collins
Forage Preservation Method Influences Alfalfa Nutritive Value and Feeding Characteristics
Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 688 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.