|
|
||||||||
Department of Dairy Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691
ABSTRACT
Methods of mastitis control that are effective against Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus have been developed and proven successful. These control procedures, however, are not as effective against the environmental pathogens. Environmental pathogens are predominantly the coliform bacteria and species of streptococci other than Streptococcus agalactiae. The total extent of their present involvement in mastitis is not well documented, and this is due in part to differences in the nature of infection by environmental pathogens compared to Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus infections. Concern regarding the importance of environmental pathogens in mastitis is increasing. This concern is based, first, on current trends of dairy cattle housing and management that increase exposure of teat ends to environmental pathogens and, second, on a reduction of prevalence of Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus infected quarters. The latter is a result of the effectiveness of postmilking teat end disinfection and dry cow therapy. Development of equally effective control methods for the environmental pathogens will be an important area of future mastitis research.
1 Salaries and research support provided by State and Federal Funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University. Journal Article No. 123-81.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. G. Lopez-Benavides, J. H. Williamson, G. D. Pullinger, S. J. Lacy-Hulbert, R. T. Cursons, and J. A. Leigh Field Observations on the Variation of Streptococcus uberis Populations in a Pasture-Based Dairy Farm J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5558 - 5566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Smith, A. Chapa, S. Willard, C. Herndon Jr., R. J. Williams, J. Crouch, T. Riley, and D. Pogue Evaporative Tunnel Cooling of Dairy Cows in the Southeast. II: Impact on Lactation Performance. J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 3915 - 3923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |