JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 66 No. 6 1359-1369
© 1983 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassell, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cassell, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, H. D.

Impact of Culling on Modified Contemporary Comparison Sire Evaluations1

B. G. Cassell2 and B. T. McDaniel

Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27650

H. D. Norman

US Department of Agriculture, Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705

ABSTRACT

Sire evaluations by Modified Contemporary Comparison routinely are calculated separately for first and later lactations. The published proofs, based on all lactations, are a function of information from these two evaluations. Four data sets from daughters of 200 widely used Holstein sires were used to examine the impact of selection on Modified Contemporary Comparisons. Set 1 contained over 670,000 daughters with first and second records in the herd where the first was initiated. Sets 2 to 4 contained these same first records but only second records from the best 90, 80, and 70% of daughters based on Modified Contemporary Deviations for milk in first lactation. Means for Predicted Difference milk based on second records increased from 367 to 476, 573, and 670 kg as elimination of second records increased from none to 10, 20, and 30% with corresponding standard deviations of 274, 250, 238, and 228 kg. Correlations between Predicted Difference milk from first and second lactations declined as culling intensity increased (.85, .81, .77, and .73) for no, 10, 20, and 30% culling of seconds. Regression of second lactation milk proof on first declined with increased culling (.87, .75, .68, and .62). Adjustment for selection of second lactation proofs from files subjected to culling produced means and standard deviations similar to second lactation proofs from files where all daughters had a second record (mean = 367, 359, 359, and 360 kg, standard deviation = 274, 273, 272, and 272 kg). Adjusted second lactation evaluations from culled data sets produced sire ranks nearly identical to those from unculled records.


FOOTNOTES

1 Paper No. 8473 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh.

2 Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.