JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 66 No. 5 1084-1093
© 1983 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGilliard, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by James, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McGilliard, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by James, R. E.

Grouping Lactating Cows by Nutritional Requirements for Feeding1

M. L. McGilliard, J. M. Swisher and R. E. James

Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061

ABSTRACT

A method (cluster) of grouping cows simultaneously by requirements of crude protein percentage and megacalories net energy per kilogram expected dry matter intake was developed and compared to grouping by test day milk, fat-corrected milk, and dairy merit (fat-corrected milk/body weight.75). One year of monthly Dairy Herd Improvement test day records from 80 Holstein herds chosen from four herd sizes yielded 110,264 records from 941 herd test days. Cows in each herd on each test day were ranked and allocated by each of the four methods to two groups of equal size. The cluster method used standardized concentrations of protein and energy to minimize variation within groups. It grouped 25, 22, and 15% of the cows differently from milk, fat-corrected milk, and dairy merit methods. Displacement of cows in rank within herd averaged 17, 15, and 11% of possible misranking. Cows in first lactation less than 46 days were placed in the high group with a frequency of 98, 49, 48, and 64% for cluster, milk, fat-corrected milk, and dairy merit methods. Intraclass correlations among cows in the same group were .66, 49, .54, and .61 for protein percentage and .61, .28, .34, and .42 for net energy concentration. Average variation of net energy concentration in the low cluster groups was half that in the low groups from other methods. The cluster procedure was effective for grouping cows homogeneously by nutritional requirements.

FOOTNOTES

1 This project was supported by a grant from the Pratt Animal Nutrition Council, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.