JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 66 No. 11 2418-2425
© 1983 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lofgren, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McDaniel, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lofgren, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McDaniel, B. T.

Effects of Culling on Sire Evaluations by Mixed Models

D. L. Lofgren, B. G. Cassell, H. D. Norman1 and B. T. McDaniel2

Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061

ABSTRACT

The data consisted of the first two records for milk and fat yield of 677,800 daughters of 200 widely used Holstein sires. From these data, 10, 20, and 30% of second records were eliminated for least yield of milk in first lactation. Best Linear Unbiased Prediction evaluations of sires were obtained separately for both records and seconds only for culled and unculled groups and for all first records. Evaluations from second records were affected by culling with standard deviations for milk evaluations declining 58 kg as elimination of second records increased from 0 to 30%. Correlations between first and second milk evaluations declined from .84 to .70 as culling increased. Evaluations by both records showed little effect of culling with standard deviations declining only slightly with culling, and correlations among the evaluations close to unity. Adjustment of second evaluations for selection appeared to remove much effect of selection. Best Linear Unbiased Prediction evaluations and those based on the same daughters from Modified Contemporary Comparison procedures showed similar effects of culling and adjustment for culling and ranked bulls nearly identically.


FOOTNOTES

1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705.

2 North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27650.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.