JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 65 No. 8 1445-1456
© 1982 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Van Soest, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Van Soest, P. J.

Feed Intake, Apparent Diet Digestibility, and Rate of Particulate Passage in Dairy Cattle

P. E. Colucci1, L. E. Chase and P. J. Van Soest

Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

ABSTRACT

Depressions in digestibility of both diet and feed fractions were measured in two diets fed at two intakes to dairy cattle. A low forage diet of 32% forage and 68% concentrate (dry matter) and a high forage diet of 83% forage and 17% concentrate were fed to dry cows at maintenance and lactating cows at ad libitum intake. Lactating cows consumed 42.1 and 32.2 g dry matter/kg body weight on the low forage and high forage diets whereas dry cows consumed 12.0 and 13.0. Energy digestibilities were 67.5 and 64.0% for lactating cows on the low forage and high forage diets and 73.7 and 67.6% for dry cows. Depressions in digestibility for dry matter, neutral detergent fiber, hemicellulose, cellulose, energy, and cell solubles per unit of intake were greater on the low forage diet. Retention time of concentrate increased by .44 units for each unit increase in retention time of forage. Retention times in the total tract for forage and concentrates were 62 and 73% less at low intake on the low forage diet. Similar results for the high forage diet were 80 and 81%. Retention times of concentrate and forage were correlated with digestibility of gross energy.


FOOTNOTES

1 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. E. Chibisa, G. N. Gozho, A. G. Van Kessel, A. A. Olkowski, and T. Mutsvangwa
Effects of Peripartum Propylene Glycol Supplementation on Nitrogen Metabolism, Body Composition, and Gene Expression for the Major Protein Degradation Pathways in Skeletal Muscle in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3512 - 3527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. C. Olson, R. C. Cochran, E. C. Titgemeyer, C. P. Mathis, T. J. Jones, and J. S. Heldt
Prediction of the energy content of tallgrass prairie hay
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1372 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. H. Clark, K. C. Olson, T. B. Schmidt, M. L. Linville, D. O. Alkire, D. L. Meyer, G. K. Rentfrow, C. C. Carr, and E. P. Berg
Effects of dry matter intake restriction on diet digestion, energy partitioning, phosphorus retention, and ruminal fermentation by beef steers
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3383 - 3390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Gabel, B. Pieper, K. Friedel, M. Radke, A. Hagemann, J. Voigt, and S. Kuhla
Influence of Nutrition Level on Digestibility in High Yielding Cows and Effects on Energy Evaluation Systems
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 3992 - 3998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.