JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 65 No. 6 1029-1035
© 1982 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hylton, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hylton, W. E.

Coliform Counts in Various Bedding Materials1

T. P. Fairchild, B. J. McArthur, J. H. Moore and W. E. Hylton

University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824

ABSTRACT

In the first of three trials to compare total coliform and klebsiella counts in various bedding materials, freestalls were bedded with either green softwood sawdust or the same sawdust with lime mixed in the sawdust in the rear of each stall. Although there were fewer klebsiella organisms on teat ends of cows using the stalls with lime, this difference was small, and there was no significant difference in the numbers of klebsiella or total coliform organisms in the two types of bedding. In the second trial tie-stalls were bedded with either green sawdust or lime. There were differences between the two types of bedding with lower total coliform and klebsiella counts in the lime and on the teat ends of cows using stalls bedded with lime. In a third trial, free-stalls were bedded with green sawdust, lime, washed concrete-grade sand, or cellulose fiber from old newsprint. There were differences in total coliform and klebsiella counts of these materials with the highest counts in sawdust and paper and with negligible numbers in lime and sand. Also, there were fewer organisms in paper bedding than in sawdust.


FOOTNOTES

1 Scientific Contribution 1109 from the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Magnusson, B. Svensson, C. Kolstrup, and A. Christiansson
Bacillus cereus in Free-Stall Bedding
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5473 - 5482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. S. Hogan, S. L. Wolf, and C. S. Petersson-Wolfe
Bacterial Counts in Organic Materials Used as Free-Stall Bedding Following Treatment with a Commercial Conditioner1
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 1058 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Kristula, W. Rogers, J. S. Hogan, and M. Sabo
Comparison of Bacteria Populations in Clean and Recycled Sand used for Bedding in Dairy Facilities
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4317 - 4325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Zdanowicz, J. A. Shelford, C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk
Bacterial Populations on Teat Ends of Dairy Cows Housed in Free Stalls and Bedded with Either Sand or Sawdust
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1694 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, and D. Fraser
Effects of Three Types of Free-Stall Surfaces on Preferences and Stall Usage by Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2003; 86(2): 521 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.