JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 65 No. 3 419-425
© 1982 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raubertas, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Shook, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Raubertas, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Shook, G. E.

Relationship Between Lactation Measures of Somatic Cell Concentration and Milk Yield1

R. F. Raubertas2 and G. E. Shook

Dairy Science Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

ABSTRACT

Data were from herds on Dairy Herd Improvement in Wisconsin which were regularly tested for somatic cells. Lactation cell counts were taken as the average of either actual or natural log of individual tests during the lactation. Lactation milk yield was regressed on somatic cell concentration, among other concomitant variables, for each of the first four lactations. The amount of data ranged from 4,912 cows in 346 herds for lactation 1 to 1,759 cows in 202 herds for lactation 4. Yield loss per unit increase in average loge cell count was 135 ± 20 kg in first lactation and 270 ± 30 kg for all other lactations. These relationships were linear, indicating that loss per unit increase in actual cell count is greatest when cell count is low. Linearity of the regression of yield on average log cell count makes this more desirable than actual cell count as a potential trait for indirect selection for genetic resistance to mastitis. The effect on yield in a given lactation of increased average log cell concentration in the previous lactation was not statistically significant. However, the magnitude of estimates for carry-over effects were as much as 50% of concurrent effects. This suggests the possibility of an important amount of carry-over.


FOOTNOTES

1 Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences.

2 Statistics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. P. Berry, B. O'Brien, E. J. O'Callaghan, K. O. Sullivan, and W. J. Meaney
Temporal trends in bulk tank somatic cell count and total bacterial count in irish dairy herds during the past decade.
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 4083 - 4093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. J. LeBlanc, K. D. Lissemore, D. F. Kelton, T. F. Duffield, and K. E. Leslie
Major advances in disease prevention in dairy cattle.
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1267 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. J. Wilson, R. N. Gonzalez, J. Hertl, H. F. Schulte, G. J. Bennett, Y. H. Schukken, and Y. T. Grohn
Effect of Clinical Mastitis on the Lactation Curve: A Mixed Model Estimation Using Daily Milk Weights
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2073 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. H. Miller, H. D. Norman, G. R. Wiggans, and J. R. Wright
Relationship of Test-Day Somatic Cell Score with Test-Day and Lactation Milk Yields
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2299 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. V. Capuco, S. E. Ellis, S. A. Hale, E. Long, R. A. Erdman, X. Zhao, and M. J. Paape
Lactation persistency: Insights from mammary cell proliferation studies
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(suppl_3): 18 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.