JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 65 No. 11 2150-2156
© 1982 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cady, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burnside, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cady, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burnside, E. B.

Evaluation of Dairy Bulls in Ontario for Calving Ease of Offspring

R. A. Cady1 and E. B. Burnside

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

ABSTRACT

The first sire evaluations for calving ease for bulls used in Ontario were published in May, 1981. Evaluations used calving records collected by Ontario Dairy Herd Improvement Association from all supervised herds from May, 1980, to April, 1981. A total of 34,240 records including herd, breed, sire, and cow identification, date of calving, and information about cow size, parity, sex of calf, mortality, and dystocia score were collected. After editing, 28,947 records were available from 1,178 Holstein bulls. Dystocia scores were 1) unobserved or unassisted, 2) easy pull, 3) hard pull, and 4) surgery. Stillbirths represented 5.5% of births coded 1 and 2, 25.1% of births coded hard pull, and 50.7% of surgical births. Analysis of variance showed that cow size, sex of calf, parity, and season (May to September and October to April) affected dystocia scores. Variance components were estimated prior to evaluation by Henderson's new method and resulted in a heritability of .08. Sire evaluation was by best linear unbiased prediction and included the relationship matrix. The prediction model included herd-year-season, dam size-parity-sex, and sire effects. Ninety-one sires had evaluations with a Repeatability of at least 55% and records in at least 20 herd-year-seasons.

FOOTNOTES

1 Department of Animal Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.