JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 65 No. 1 146-153
© 1982 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natzke, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Everett, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Natzke, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Everett, R. W.

Cow Preference for Free of Stall Surface Material

R. P. Natzke, D. R. Bray and R. W. Everett

Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

ABSTRACT

Comparative cow preference for rubber mats, carpeting, and layered mat was determined with 30 cows divided into three 10-cow divided into three 10-cow groups. In alternate 2 wk, cows were assigned to one of the surfaces and then given 2 wk to select a given stall material. A 24-h Observation was at the end of each 2 wk to determine stall lying and standing time. when cows were assigned to a stall surface, they spent more time occupying stalls when they were in carpeted and layered mat stalls than in rubber mat stalls. when cows were allowed to select stalls. layered stalls were used most frequently.

In Trial 2,a fourth group of 10 stalls was covered with vulcanized rubber product, and an additional 10 cows were utilized. As in Trial 1, cows spent less time in stalls covered with rubber mat than in those with other surfaces. When Provided a choice, cows selected stalls covered with layered and vulcanized mats. This difference in preference may be from greater compressability of layered and vulcanized products.

Cows produced the most milk during the time they were given a choice of stalls. This also corresponded to the period with the greatest time of stall utilization. However, more data are needed before strong inferences can be drawn.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Norring, E. Manninen, A. M. de Passille, J. Rushen, L. Munksgaard, and H. Saloniemi
Effects of Sand and Straw Bedding on the Lying Behavior, Cleanliness, and Hoof and Hock Injuries of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 570 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
I. Veissier, J. Capdeville, and E. Delval
Cubicle housing systems for cattle: Comfort of dairy cows depends on cubicle adjustment
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3321 - 3337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. B. Cook, K. V. Nordlund, and G. R. Oetzel
Environmental Influences on Claw Horn Lesions Associated with Laminitis and Subacute Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E36 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. M. Wagner-Storch, R. W. Palmer, and D. W. Kammel
Factors Affecting Stall Use for Different Freestall Bases
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2003; 86(6): 2253 - 2266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, and D. Fraser
Effects of Three Types of Free-Stall Surfaces on Preferences and Stall Usage by Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2003; 86(2): 521 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.