HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bell, B. R. Articles by Kliewer, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bell, B. R. Articles by Kliewer, R. H.

Effects of Genetic Merit of Herdmates on Sire Summaries for Type in Holstein Cattle

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

H. D. Norman and R. H. Kliewer

United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD
Holstein Association of America, Brattleboro, VT

ABSTRACT

Official classification records (755,744) of the Holstein Association of America were used to ascertain effects of genetic merit of herdmates on sire evaluations for type. Progeny were stratified into three groups on herdmate average for final score: low (less than 79.75), middle (79.75 to 81.75), and high (more than 81.75). Predicted Differences for type were computed in each group for 670 sires with 20 or more progeny in each of the herdmate groups. Mean Predicted Differences for type for three herdmate groups were .12, —.28, and —.45, indicating tfiat failure to adjust for non-random use of sires affected herdmate comparisons for type. The correlation between herdmate average and average Predicted Difference for type of herd-mates' sires was .48, and between herd-mate average and average Cow Index Type of herdmates was .45. Two iterative procedures and a mixed model comparison were examined as alternatives to sire evaluation by herdmate comparison. All were effective in reducing differences by herdmate groups. However, proofs in the low group still were favored slightly by all three models. The mixed model comparison appeared to be the most effective in reducing effects of nonrandom usage.

¹ Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27607.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Gengler, G. R. Wiggans, L. L. M. Thornton, J. R. Wright, and T. Druet Accounting for heterogeneous variances in multitrait evaluation of Jersey type traits. J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3143 - 3151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]