HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Riddell, D. O. Articles by Dayton, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Riddell, D. O. Articles by Dayton, A. D.

Effect of Nicotinic Acid on Microbial Protein Synthesis In Vitro and on Dairy Cattle Growth and Milk Production^1,2,

Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506

ABSTRACT

The effect of nicotinic acid (niacin) on microbial fermentation was tested in vitro. Microbial protein synthesis was greater with niacin and soybean meal than with niacin and urea. Otherwise, in most instances niacin decreased synthesis with urea. These responses to niacin with soybean meal occurred regardless of roughage type or ratio of roughage to concentrate, except when the substrate contained 50% roughage from alfalfa; then the opposite was true. Adding niacin to urea-containing rations of heifers weighing 375 or 114 kg failed to improve the heifers' weight gain or feed efficiency. In one of two lactation studies with cows in midlactation fed urea-containing rations, a slight increase in milk production was attributable to niacin; in the other, a slight improvement in milk protein production was attributable to niacin. In a third lactation study, but with fresh cows, milk production increased in cows receiving niacin and soybean meal but not in those receiving niacin and urea. In a fourth lactation study with fresh cows fed soybean meal, cows receiving niacin gave slightly more milk than did those receiving none. Response to niacin is greater in fresh cows than in those in midlactation and is greater in cows fed natural protein than in those fed urea.

¹ Contribution 81—45—j, Ruminant Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, and Department of Statistics, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan.

² Supported in part by a grant from Lonza Inc., Fairlawn, NJ. The assistance of R. G. Kohler, Dr. A. Moiola, J. R. Robinson, and C. M. Boland is gratefully acknowledged.