JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 64 No. 10 2096-2104
© 1981 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oltenacu, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Foote, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oltenacu, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Foote, R. H.

Systems Analysis for Designing Reproductive Management Programs to Increase Production and Profit in Dairy Herds

P. A. Oltenacu1, T. R. Rounsaville1, R. A. Milligan2 and R. H. Foote1

Departments of Animal Science,1
and Agricultural Economics, Cornell University,2, Ithaca, NY 14853

ABSTRACT

Relative economic merits of three heat detection rates and three conception rates were evaluated by mathematical modeling and dynamic simulation. Three heat detection programs evaluated were: a) poor, with no specific time set aside for detection and detection rate of .35; b) average, with two 45-min observations each day and detection rate of .55; c) good, with three 45-min observations each day and detection rate of .75. Changing heat detection program from poor to average and average to good decreased days open from 136 to 119 and to 105. Corresponding increases in net return per cow per year were $60 and $4.

Three breeding programs evaluated were: a) poor, direct service by an inexperienced inseminator and conception rate of .42; b) average, professional artificial inseminator servicing the cows with a single insemination at each service and conception rate of .50; c) good, professional artificial inseminator using two inseminations during each service period and conception rate of .58. Changing breeding program from poor to average and average to good decreased days open from 123 to 119 and to 115. Corresponding changes in net return per cow per year were an increase of $39 and a decrease of $7.


FOOTNOTES

1 Department of Animal Science.

2 Department of Agricultural Economics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. De Vries, M. B. Crane, J. A. Bartolome, P. Melendez, C. A. Risco, and L. F. Archbald
Economic comparison of timed artificial insemination and exogenous progesterone as treatments for ovarian cysts.
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3028 - 3037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Meadows, P. J. Rajala-Schultz, and G. S. Frazer
A Spreadsheet-Based Model Demonstrating the Nonuniform Economic Effects of Varying Reproductive Performance in Ohio Dairy Herds
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1244 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. Groenendaal, D. T. Galligan, and H. A. Mulder
An Economic Spreadsheet Model to Determine Optimal Breeding and Replacement Decisions for Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2146 - 2157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. de Vries and B. J. Conlin
Economic Value of Timely Determination of Unexpected Decreases in Detection of Estrus Using Control Charts
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3516 - 3526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.