JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 62 No. 8 1368-1373
© 1979 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruebele, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gruebele, J. W.

The California Experience in Component Pricing

J. W. Gruebele, Vice President and Economist

Dairyman's Cooperative Creamery Association, Tulare, CA 93274

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses reasons for component pricing, why it has been considered successful in California, and how it relates milk fat and solids-not-fat to production characteristics. California has used component pricing since 1962 to increase standards for fat and solids-not-fat in fluid milk products, to make returns to dairymen more equitable, to achieve greater plant control, and to improve feeding efficiency. The use of component pricing and the higher standards in California resulted in more fat and solids-not-fat usage in Class I milk than would have been true with national standards. California per capita consumption of fluid products increased since 1972 and is higher than the national average. Component pricing has not stifled efficiency.

The relationship between solids-not-fat and milk fat is reaffirmed but pad feeding may lower percentages of solids-not-fat and raise milk production per cow.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.