JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 62 No. 7 1098-1103
© 1979 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, J. L.

Feeding Whole Cottonseed to Lactating Dairy Cows

M. J. Anderson1, D. C. Adams2, R. C. Lamb1 and J. L. Walters2

Science and Education Administration, Agricultural Research, USDA
and Department of Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan 84322

ABSTRACT

Whole unprocessed cottonseed was fed to lactating cows in two trials. Total concentrates were fed at 1 kg/2 kg milk in excess of 9.1 kg per cow daily. In Trial I, 18 cows were fed a control ration. Cottonseed (1.9 kg) replaced an equivalent amount of regular concentrate for 20 cows. Milk production was higher from cows fed cottonseed, but percentage of protein was lower. Cottonseed feeding did not affect percentage of fat and solids-not-fat, intake of hay, silage, regular concentrate, or dry matter. Increased intake of digestible energy accounted for 75% of the increased production.

In Trial II, 18 cows were assigned to one of six Latin squares. Three rations were used: 1) regular concentrate, 2) replacement of 20% regular concentrate with cottonseed, 3) ration 2 but fed to provide energy equal to ration 1. Production of milk and solids-not-fat was highest from ration 2. Rations caused no significant differences for production of fat-corrected-milk, fat, and protein; percentage of fat and protein; efficiency of utilization of energy and protein; and intake of hay, silage, dry matter, and energy. Percentage of acetic, propionic, butyric, and valeric acid in rumen fluid was not affected by ration.


FOOTNOTES

1 Science and Education Administration Agricultural Research, U.S. Department of Agricultural, Logan, UT 84322

2 Department of Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan 84322




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. M. Sullivan, J. K. Bernard, and H. E. Amos
Ruminal Fermentation and Amino Acid Flow in Holstein Steers Fed Whole Cottonseed with Elevated Concentrations of Free Fatty Acids in the Oil
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 690 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. G. Prieto, E. J. DePeters, P. H. Robinson, J. E. P. Santos, J. W. Pareas, and S. J. Taylor
Increasing Dietary Levels of Cracked Pima Cottonseed Increase Plasma Gossypol but do not Influence Productive Performance of Lactating Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2003; 86(1): 254 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.