JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 62 No. 5 802-806
© 1979 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vasavada, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vasavada, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. H.

Quality of Commercial Buttermilk

P. C. Vasavada1 and C. H. White2

Animal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens 30602

ABSTRACT

Eight brands of cultured buttermilk available in local retail outlets were evaluated organoleptically and analyzed for diacetyl, acetoin, acetaldehyde, and microbial quality. A majority (73%) of samples examined on the day of purchase rated poor to fair (mean flavor score 2.2 to 3.2 on a scale 1 unacceptable to 5 excellent). Variations in concentrations of diacetyl, acetoin, and acetaldehyde were large. Acetoin increased and diacetyl concentration decreased in buttermilk samples stored for 7 days at 7 C. All brands showed a high total bacterial count and psychrotrophic bacterial count. Seven of the eight brands were contaminated with coliforms.


FOOTNOTES

1 Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Wisconsin, River Falls 54022.

2 Dean Foods Company, Rockford, IL 61101.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.