JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 61 No. 4 474-488
© 1978 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by King, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blake, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by King, R. A.

Labor and Milking Machine Inputs to Milk Harvest in Dairy Cattle: Implications for Direct Selection1

Robert W. Blake2, B. T. McDaniel and R. A. King3

Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27607

ABSTRACT

Components of variance, repeatabilities, and correlations among milking labor and machine inputs, flow rate, and yield characters were derived from data on lactating Holstein and Jersey cows and provided the basis for determining efficacy of direct selection for improved milking economy. Intralactation variance components for cow were 324, 121, and 7657 s2/milking for total labor inputs, machine stripping, and actual machine time for Holsteins. Intralactation estimates were larger than estimates among lactations. Machine stripping was the primary component of total labor input that varied among cows. Intralactation repeat-abilities for total labor inputs, machine stripping, and actual machine input for Holsteins were .29, .20, and .42. The partial correlation of average flow rate with total labor inputs holding milk yield constant was —.56, exceeding that with peak rate. Elimination of machine stripping and minimizing overmilking appeared the best means of reducing average cost of milk harvest. Culling of cows exhibiting unsuitable demands for labor and machine inputs is a more appropriate strategy for improvement than direct selection for efficiency of milking labor.

FOOTNOTES

1 Paper No. 5404 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh.

2 Dairy Section, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.

3 Department of Economics and Business.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.