JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 61 No. 11 1605-1615
© 1978 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, W. C.

Optimal Culling Strategies for Dairy Cows of Different Breeds

H. M. Stewart, E. B. Burnside and W. C. Pfeiffer

Department of Animal and Poultry Science
School of Agricultural Economics and Extension Education, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

ABSTRACT

Dynamic programming models were developed to optimize culling decisions for Holstein, Jersey, Guernsey, and Ayrshire cows. Parameters of individual breeds for milk yield, milk fat percent, body weight, and disposal reasons were considered. Replacement heifers were allowed to vary in these traits by a probability distribution function. Maximum discounted returns over major variable costs were computed for 10-yr planning for each breed for five prices.

Regardless of prices, Holsteins had the highest weighted average value of discounted returns over variable costs followed in decreasing order by Ayrshires, Guernseys, and Jerseys. Effects of the traits on these values were determined by response surfaces. Holsteins and, to a less extent, Ayrshires, would benefit from increased emphasis on milk fat percent as an effective method of increasing discounted 10-yr returns over variable costs. Values for the Jersey and Guernsey breeds would increase substantially if major emphasis were placed on milk yield. Little would be gained by increases in milk fat percent for these two breeds. These results were consistent over changes in prices of milk and feed.

Within breeds, body weight had little effect on response surfaces and had only a slight positive effect on 10-yr discounted returns over variable costs. Body weight could be conveniently omitted from the models.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.