JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 59 No. 6 1119-1123
© 1976 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bodoh, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bodoh, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, R. P., Jr.

Variation in Somatic Cell Counts in Dairy Herd Improvement Milk Samples1

G. W. Bodoh, W. J. Battista2 and L. H. Schultz

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

R. P. Johnston, Jr.

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Wisconsin, River Falls 54022

ABSTRACT

Information on variability of somatic cell numbers in Dairy Herd Improvement samples analyzed by the Filter-DNA method came from two field studies. Data consisted of 13,733 samples taken in 16 herds monthly for 2 yr in one survey and 6285 observations in 134 herds each sampled once in the other. Mean cell numbers in the studies were 692,000 and 625,000 cells per ml. Median cell number in the 16 herds was 390,000 cells per ml. Herd percentages of cows over 1 million, between 500,000 and 1 million, and below 500,000 cells per ml averaged 17.9, 20.5, and 61.6 with wide ranges. Data were transformed to a log scale and analyzed with two models, one involving herd, year, season, and age and another involving management practices. Mean differences among herds, years, seasons, age of cows, and stages of lactation were large in the 16-herd study. The model of management practices found no association of herd size and cell numbers. Herds with parlor milking systems that dipped teats and practiced selective dry cow treatment had the lowest mean cell numbers.


FOOTNOTES

1 Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and by special funds for cooperative research in agriculture at Madison and River Falls.

2 Agriculture Records Cooperative, 6225 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53705.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. H. Miller, H. D. Norman, G. R. Wiggans, and J. R. Wright
Relationship of Test-Day Somatic Cell Score with Test-Day and Lactation Milk Yields
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2299 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. A. Schreiner and P. L. Ruegg
Relationship Between Udder and Leg Hygiene Scores and Subclinical Mastitis
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3460 - 3465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. A. Schreiner and P. L. Ruegg
Effects of Tail Docking on Milk Quality and Cow Cleanliness
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2002; 85(10): 2503 - 2511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.