JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 59 No. 11 1985-1988
© 1976 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weston, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ulberg, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weston, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ulberg, L. C.

Managing Reproduction in Dairy Cattle. II. Response of Cows to Progestogen Treated Herdmates during the Postpartum Period1

J. S. Weston2 and L. C. Ulberg

Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27607

ABSTRACT

Sixty-eight lactating Holstein cows were handled as one unit but were either fed melengestrol acetate for 14 days or were contemporary controls. Cows that calved in a 21-day period were assigned to a treatment group. Those that calved during the subsequent 21 days served as controls and received no treatment. The alternating assignment was continued for 6 mo. Treated cows were between 14 to 35 days postpartum at the beginning of the feeding period. Data from all cows, combined, showed a decrease in days open (120 to 92) and services per conception (2.7 to 1.5) as compared with their previous year's record. The 34 control cows exhibited estrus over a period which coincided with that of 91% of the treated animals, with a slight delay in occurrence of first estrus. The observations suggest that control cows responded in some way to the treated cows in the early stages of the postpartum period.


FOOTNOTES

1 Paper No. 5019 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, is a contribution from the Reproductive Physiology Research Laboratory. Use of tradenames in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station of the products named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.

2 Recipient of funds from the North Carolina Dairy Foundation as a research assistantship.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.